WA Business Law Blog

What the Corporate Transparency Act Means for Your Business

David C. Tingstad, Edmonds Lawyer
David C. Tingstad
Dec 20, 2021
The Corporate Transparency Act (CTA), passed on January 1st, 2021, becomes effective in 2022 and aims to fight money laundering and other illicit activity. In this week’s blog post, we will outline the CTA and discuss how businesses can comply with its requirements. The Basics Essentially, the CTA requires reporting companies to disclose beneficial ownership… Read More

Revisiting Bishop of Victoria Corp. v. Corporate Business Park

David C. Tingstad, Edmonds Lawyer
David C. Tingstad
Nov 10, 2021
Published in 2007, Bishop of Victoria v. Corporate Business Park became a seminal case in the state of Washington with respect to LLCs and fiduciary duties.  Times have changed, however, and the law has developed since 2007. Over the next few weeks, we will discuss some of these developments and how current law applies today… Read More

Forfeiture of Interest in Action

David C. Tingstad, Edmonds Lawyer
David C. Tingstad
Oct 13, 2021
Last week, we discussed capital contribution in the context of Moses Land Grow LLC v. Brickstone Holdings LLC. This week, as promised, we will discuss the Brickstone remedy for a failure to contribute capital. Brickstone Continued As you will recall, Fladseth and Moses Land Grow LLC (MLG) agreed to form Brickstone Holdings LLC (BH) to purchase and… Read More

Capital Contributions and the Case of Brickstone Holdings, LLC

David C. Tingstad, Edmonds Lawyer
David C. Tingstad
Sep 29, 2021
Last week, we discussed different possible remedies for a failure to contribute capital. This week, let us consider a recent Washington Court of Appeals case, Moses Land Grow LLC v. Brickstone Holdings LLC, that helps to clarify the definition of a capital contribution. Moses Land Grow LLC v. Brickstone Holdings LLC In March of 2017,… Read More

Beware The Corporate Practice of Medicine

Babak Shamsi Edmonds Lawyer
Babak Shamsi
Sep 23, 2021
Washington State provides that, generally, a business entity may not employ medical professionals to practice their licensed professions.  This Corporate Practice of Medicine (CPOM) doctrine protects the relationship between medical doctors and patients.  The doctrine dates back to 1943, when the Washington Supreme Court ruled in State ex rel. Standard Optical Co. v. Superior Court, that only a person,… Read More

Remedies For Failure To Contribute Capital

David C. Tingstad, Edmonds Lawyer
David C. Tingstad
Sep 22, 2021
Every business needs capital, so what happens when members form an LLC and promise to contribute capital but fail to follow through?  The breach of such a promise is foreseeable, so plan for it. Consider drafting provisions in an LLC Agreement that outline remedies when a member breaches their promise to contribute. Our discussion this… Read More

Shotgun Buy-Sell Agreements – What Are They? Do I Need One?

David C. Tingstad, Edmonds Lawyer
David C. Tingstad
Sep 1, 2021
The premise of the shotgun buy-sell agreement is an age-old technique that dates back far beyond its legal history. Explore this analogy with me: one piece of grandpa’s famous chocolate cake remains from a family birthday party and both you and your sibling want that cake but cannot agree on who gets what size portion.… Read More

Due Diligence And Employment Issues In Transactional Matters: The Lessons Of Clarity Capital Corp. v. Ryan, Newman, & Salish Wealth Mgmt.

David C. Tingstad, Edmonds Lawyer
David C. Tingstad
Aug 31, 2021
In the context of a business combination—whether it is an asset purchase, stock purchase, or merger—due diligence is critical to establishing and maintaining value.  A recent case from the Washington Court of Appeals (Clarity Capital Corp. v. Ryan, Newman, & Salish Wealth Mgmt.), though unpublished, highlights a couple of lessons when it comes to due… Read More

Two Common Problems With Contractor Liens In Washington State

William O. Kessler, Edmonds Lawyer
William O. Kessler
Aug 2, 2021
Contractor liens are powerful tools. When contractors are not paid for their work, they may record a contractor lien (aka “materialman’s lien” or “mechanic’s lien”) against the property to ensure payment. RCW 60.04 governs the requirements for these liens. If a contractor records a proper lien against the property, RCW 60.04 allows them to foreclose… Read More